Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Anti-Auto-Tune Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Auto-Tune. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

The Anti-Auto-Tune Movement

The Anti-Auto-Tune Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The term is only coined by several sources [1] [2] but those sources does not class such "movement" to be that significant, just numerous artists that are against the use of Auto-Tune. WP:TRIVIA might apply, since there is only list the people and songs that are against auto-tune and nothing more. Esanchez_{(Talk 2 me or Sign here)} 22:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

• Merge anything worth keeping with Auto-Tune. Subject is not notable on its own. –Grondemar 00:54, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Auto-Tune. I think the term "movement" is a little big for what this is. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 16:04, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.