Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tevita Folau
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom 17:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Tevita Folau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has never played first-grade football, and at 26, quite probably never will Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete, a bit of coverage here and here, although it's questionable how much coverage Tevita would have got if it weren't for his brother Israel Folau. Lankiveil (speak to me) 23:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- After thinking about it for a bit, I'm going to go with delete. He doesn't pass WP:NSPORTS and the only coverage he has received is because of his brother, but notability is not inherited. Jenks24 (talk) 08:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting comment. This discussion was never transcluded onto a log page so let's give it some more time. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - as athlete just failing to reach notability Yaksar (let's chat) 02:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - needs more sources. Monterey Bay (talk) 04:31, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.